| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityIf I'm understanding https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-jobs/using-a-matrix-for-your-jobs#handling-failures correctly, we can achieve what we want to with something like:
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Qualityfailure-allowed is a verb/phrase that we can change as we wish to communicate things via the variable name. The example from GitHub used experimental.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityThanks, I did try something along those lines, but wasn't successful.
Although I think #264 is a better approach? Then we'll at least see if the non-greenlet tests fail for 3.12. And when greenlet installs for 3.12, it'll start testing those too.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityLooking at your force-pushed events' diffs, I don't see continue-on-error: ${{ matrix.failure-allowed }} being added at any point at the job.<id> level; which might be why they didn't work?
Regardless, they're both valid approaches to solving the problem so it's not a big deal which one we go with. :)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityI also tried it in another branch:
Very similar to your snippet:
But still failed a PR: hugovk#3
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityIndeed! Thanks for clarifying! ^.^
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.