Walkthrough

This pull request updates the dependency versions in the rollup/go.mod file by bumping, adding, and removing several packages. In addition, a new field, AuthorizationList, is added to the TransactionData structure in rollup/internal/controller/watcher/l2_watcher.go, where it is populated by invoking tx.SetCodeAuthorizations(). These changes adjust module compatibility and enhance transaction data details.

Changes

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant TX as Transaction
    participant F as txsToTxsData Function
    participant TD as TransactionData

    TX->>F: Pass transaction
    F->>TX: Call SetCodeAuthorizations()
    TX-->>F: Return authorization list
    F->>TD: Populate AuthorizationList
    TD-->>F: Build complete transaction data

Possibly related PRs

• feat(bridge-history-api): update l2geth dependency for Pectra readiness #1601: Updates similar dependencies in the go.mod file, particularly for github.com/scroll-tech/da-codec and github.com/scroll-tech/go-ethereum.
• refactor: use new codec interfaces #1530: Involves modifications to the go.mod file with updates to dependency versions for github.com/scroll-tech/go-ethereum and github.com/scroll-tech/da-codec.

Suggested labels

bump-version

Suggested reviewers

• Thegaram
• georgehao
• 0xmountaintop

Poem

I'm a bright bunny with a hop in my stride,
Updating the code with a logical guide.
Dependencies bounce and auth fields bloom,
In a rhythm of change that clears up the room.
Hoppy coding days for all on this ride!

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 51.72%. Comparing base (6b837c0) to head (f1418eb).

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1600      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    51.72%   51.72%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          157      157              
  Lines        12555    12556       +1     
===========================================
  Hits          6494     6494              
- Misses        5497     5498       +1     
  Partials       564      564              

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

I think would be better to merge it into #1583 once scroll-tech/da-codec#43 is merged as well

what's the rationale for doing this? e.g. there seem no conflicts merging into develop and then merging develop in #1583.

I think would be better to merge it into #1583 once scroll-tech/da-codec#43 is merged as well

what's the rationale for doing this? e.g. there seem no conflicts merging into develop and then merging develop in #1583.

changed the base branch to feat/use-codec-v6.