FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

Update to version 0.16.0 by daspecster · Pull Request #1854 · googleapis/google-cloud-python · GitHub

Update to version 0.16.0 - #1854

Merged
daspecster merged 1 commit into
googleapis:masterfrom
daspecster:cut-0.16.0
Jun 20, 2016
Merged

Update to version 0.16.0#1854
daspecster merged 1 commit into
googleapis:masterfrom
daspecster:cut-0.16.0

Conversation

daspecster commented Jun 13, 2016
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Jun 13, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tseaver, what do you think about merging in #1815 and #1844 for this release?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tseaver, #1844 got merged and I'm inclined to leave #1813 out unless we can merge it today. But I'm not sure about #1815?

tseaver commented Jun 15, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I just merged #1815. I think we should merge #1813 today, and then make a release.

tseaver commented Jun 15, 2016
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
$ git log -1 --pretty=%H
a74ed9e3e8a8abbe46ca7968ed21cb9a1762dda9
$ git log 0.15.0..HEAD | grep 'Merge pull request ' |  awk -F ' ' '{print $4}' | sort

yields:

#1815
#1816
#1843
#1848
#1851
#1855
#1861

tseaver commented Jun 15, 2016
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

0.16.0 Release Notes

Core

Datastore

Storage

Pubsub

Bigtable

Logging

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tseaver also I made a release draft for 0.16.0 just fyi.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tseaver, when I rerun

$ git log 0.15.0..HEAD | grep 'Merge pull request ' |  awk -F ' ' '{print $4}' | sort

I don't see the new PRs in there...#1813, #1860, #1844...possibly others?

Any ideas?

tseaver commented Jun 16, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Have you merged your local master with upstream/master?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I rebased it.

Do they show up for you?

tseaver commented Jun 16, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Also, "merge w/ squash commits" doesn't create a merge commit findable by that command line. I manually ran git log 0.15.0..HEAD and looked at the commits to uncover #1844, for instance.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Ah that's it! I did use the github squash merge and I didn't add "Merge pull request" to the commit message.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I left out #1860 since you mentioned it's not user facing really.

@tseaver I think once we get the GRPCIO 0.14.0 issues on appveyor and the docs generation working we can cut this release right?

tseaver commented Jun 16, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I think once we get the GRPCIO 0.14.0 issues on appveyor and the docs generation working we can cut this release right?

SGTM

tseaver commented Jun 17, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is grpcio 0.14.0 expected to Just Work (TM) on Windows? Given my last comments on #1863, I'd say we could go ahead with our release even though Appveyor is broken.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tseaver, is there any fallout we could be heading towards by releasing?

It looks like my credentials helper function errors if it doesn't have permissions. I can just catch that in an except so it fails more peacefully.

https://ci.appveyor.com/project/daspecster/gcloud-python/build/1.0.1.master/job/433qv2dtg3uq4a4t#L513

tseaver commented Jun 17, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'd say we can go ahead and release, unless @jgeewax thinks that the grpico-on-Windows bit from #1815 is a blocker.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tseaver we could merge in #1868 to fix some of the appveyor issues but not all obviously.

tseaver commented Jun 20, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sounds good. The remaining failures will then be blocked on a fix for grpc/grpc#6939.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Ok, sounds like a plan. Is there anything we can do to help resolve that?

tseaver commented Jun 20, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@daspecster I just updated the checklist to pull in #1870 and the need to fix #1869.

tseaver commented Jun 20, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@daspecster #1874 reverts pubsub defaults to the safe JSON-over-HTTP. AFAIK, it would be the last change needed before merging here.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

We should probably note this in the release notes.

tseaver commented Jun 20, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@daspecster I just updated the release note above for pubsub.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Good to go then right?

tseaver commented Jun 20, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yup!

daspecster merged commit 986302f into googleapis:master Jun 20, 2016
daspecster deleted the cut-0.16.0 branch January 24, 2017 15:21
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL