FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

test: reduce impact of flaky HTTP server tests by tniessen · Pull Request #42926 · nodejs/node · GitHub

/ node Public

test: reduce impact of flaky HTTP server tests - #42926

Merged
aduh95 merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
tniessen:flaky-test-http-server-x-timeout-keepalive
May 2, 2022
Merged

test: reduce impact of flaky HTTP server tests#42926
aduh95 merged 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
tniessen:flaky-test-http-server-x-timeout-keepalive

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Mark the tests as flaky on macOS and increase the timeout for other platforms (namely, FreeBSD).

Context: #42741 (comment)

Median success rate (refer to patch and separate tables above):

osx11 freebsd12-x64
master (2000ms) 91.0 % 83.8 %
patched (5000ms) 71.3 % 100 %

Refs: #42741

tniessen added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 30, 2022
tniessen requested a review from richardlau April 30, 2022 13:06
nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Apr 30, 2022
github-actions Bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 30, 2022

This comment was marked as outdated.

tniessen commented Apr 30, 2022
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Is PASS,FLAKY not the right configuration? node-test-commit-osx still fails with this. Should it be SKIP?

Removed the file extensions, maybe that works.

tniessen force-pushed the flaky-test-http-server-x-timeout-keepalive branch from 35014d7 to 06c1abe Compare April 30, 2022 14:06

targos commented Apr 30, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Removed the file extensions, maybe that works.

Yep:

# To mark a test as flaky, list the test name in the appropriate section
# below, without ".js", followed by ": PASS,FLAKY". Example:
# sample-test : PASS,FLAKY

tniessen added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 30, 2022
github-actions Bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 30, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

aduh95 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

The flakiness is also annoying on the GHA runner, and unfortunately this PR won't help with that I'm afraid. Oh well, at least it's improving things for the Jenkins CI, so LGTM.

tniessen commented May 1, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

The flakiness is also annoying on the GHA runner, and unfortunately this PR won't help with that I'm afraid.

@aduh95 I am not sure about that. #42741 (comment) suggested that GitHub Actions might respect the list of flaky tests.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

tniessen commented May 1, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

CI is failing because of nodejs/build#2917.

tniessen added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no outstanding review comments, and a CI started. label May 1, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

tniessen added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label May 2, 2022

tniessen commented May 2, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

CI is green but GitHub seems to be thinking that Jenkins is still running, and the commit queue refuses to run...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

aduh95 removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label May 2, 2022
aduh95 merged commit 0fc455a into nodejs:master May 2, 2022

aduh95 commented May 2, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Landed in 0fc455a

tniessen commented May 2, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Thank you @aduh95 :)

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2022
Refs: #42741

PR-URL: #42926
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS mentioned this pull request May 10, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR is dependent on #42846, so marking as blocked.

This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no outstanding review comments, and a CI started. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL