test,crypto: update WebCryptoAPI WPT - #54593
Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit intoAug 29, 2024
Merged
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
|
Review requested:
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
jasnell
approved these changes
Aug 27, 2024
avivkeller
reviewed
Aug 27, 2024
Comment thread
test/wpt/status/WebCryptoAPI.cjs
Closed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅ Additional details and impacted files @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #54593 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 87.33% 87.34%
=======================================
Files 649 649
Lines 182623 182570 -53
Branches 35041 35026 -15
=======================================
- Hits 159498 159459 -39
+ Misses 16400 16390 -10
+ Partials 6725 6721 -4 see 42 files with indirect coverage changes 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
benjamingr
approved these changes
Aug 27, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
targos
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2024
anonrig
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
lpinca
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2024
avivkeller
reviewed
Aug 28, 2024
Comment thread
test/common/wpt.js
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2024
Refs: #54572 Refs: #54468 PR-URL: #54593 Refs: #54572 Refs: #54468 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Merged
panva
added a commit
to panva/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2025
Refs: nodejs#54572 Refs: nodejs#54468 PR-URL: nodejs#54593 Refs: nodejs#54572 Refs: nodejs#54468 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Author
|
v20.x backport in #58589 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
marco-ippolito
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2025
Refs: #54572 Refs: #54468 PR-URL: #54593 Backport-PR-URL: #58589 Refs: #54572 Refs: #54468 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Merged
marco-ippolito
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2025
Refs: #54572 Refs: #54468 PR-URL: #54593 Backport-PR-URL: #58589 Refs: #54572 Refs: #54468 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
marco-ippolito
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2025
Refs: #54572 Refs: #54468 PR-URL: #54593 Backport-PR-URL: #58589 Refs: #54572 Refs: #54468 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR:
The CJS status file is necessary for this update since the vectors the WPT update is adding are passing on the Jenkins CI s390x nodes but fail everywhere else, I would love to know why but I didn't dig into it much. Marking the tests as flaky is not accurate, so instead the CJS status file allows to detect os.arch() and change the expectations accordingly.
Refs: #54572
Refs: #54468
cc @redyetidev
Note: I can potentially split the WPT runner update and WebCryptoAPI WPT pull into two separate commits with a rebase label in this PR.