This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason
Spam
Abuse
Off Topic
Outdated
Duplicate
Resolved
Low Quality
Doesn't this just mask issues? I don't remember if we have nullability annotations on, but I think if you want to add a check here, it should throw ArgumentNullException, and instead null should be handled at the call site.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason
Spam
Abuse
Off Topic
Outdated
Duplicate
Resolved
Low Quality
It does mask issues, but in a non-failing way which is a lot better than raising during startup (which effectively renders this library useless). This is an adaptation of what fixes #2405. Throwing an exception here is (apart from having a slightly better stacktrace) effectively the same as leaving the code unchanged.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason
Spam
Abuse
Off Topic
Outdated
Duplicate
Resolved
Low Quality
I mean I suggest to check for null at the call site which is what #2405 (comment) does, and optionally add an argument check in ShouldBindMethod to throw something better than NullReferenceException.
Simply returning false for null inputs is error-prone.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityDoesn't this just mask issues? I don't remember if we have nullability annotations on, but I think if you want to add a check here, it should throw ArgumentNullException, and instead null should be handled at the call site.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityIt does mask issues, but in a non-failing way which is a lot better than raising during startup (which effectively renders this library useless). This is an adaptation of what fixes #2405. Throwing an exception here is (apart from having a slightly better stacktrace) effectively the same as leaving the code unchanged.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityI mean I suggest to check for null at the call site which is what #2405 (comment) does, and optionally add an argument check in ShouldBindMethod to throw something better than NullReferenceException.
Simply returning false for null inputs is error-prone.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityI don't agree, but I will also not put any more work into this. If you want to propose a different solution (in code), be my guest.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality@filmor opened #2409
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.